Since completing his clerkship for the Hon. Paul C. Weick of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Bob has practiced law in Dallas, Texas, for more than forty years. A former equity partner in a large international law firm and his own boutique litigation firm, he is now “Of Counsel” at Cobb Martinez Woodward LLP. Bob’s practice involves complex business litigation, primarily in the energy industry; construction-defects litigation; and high-dollar personal-injury matters. He has successfully defended a number of “bet-the-company” cases. Bob also has extensive appellate experience, having argued before most federal and Texas appellate courts, including the Texas and Oklahoma Supreme Courts. An accomplished writer, Bob taught legal writing at SMU’s law school and has published two books on Texas discovery practice and many law review articles on a variety of topics.
Marietta College, B.A., summa cum laude
College of William & Mary, J.D.
- Symposium Editor of the William and Mary Law Review
Texas
All Texas federal district courts
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Bob has tried tens of lawsuits and arbitrations and has argued tens of appeals and mandamus proceedings in most Texas and federal appellate courts, including the Texas and Oklahoma Supreme Courts. Some of his trial and appellate accomplishments include:
- In a case of first impression, reversed a trial court’s order granting the plaintiff’s motion to increase juror pay beyond that set by the county’s Commissioner’s Court. See In re Oncor Elec. Delivery Co., No. 05-23-00298-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 2154, 2023 WL 2726739 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 31, 2023, orig. proceeding).
- Obtained affirmation of a summary judgment in favor of a large oil and gas company in an environmental action alleging surface and groundwater contamination by the company’s operations. See Lahijani v. Merit Energy Co., No. 14-20-00393-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6045, 2022 WL 345894 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 18, 2022, no pet.).
- In a case important to all regulated electric utilities in Texas and one that resolved a split among the courts of appeals, LWS persuaded the Texas Supreme Court that the Public Utility Commission of Texas has exclusive jurisdiction over breach-of-contract claims involving electric-utility rates, operations, or services. The Court’s decision resulted in the reversal of a substantial monetary judgment against LWS’s client, Oncor Electric Delivery Co. LLC, the largest transmission and distribution utility in Texas. See Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. v. Chaparral Energy, LLC, No. 16-0301, 546 S.W.3d 133 (2018).
- In a case of first impression, convinced the Oklahoma Supreme Court to affirm a trial court’s application of non-Oklahoma law to the determination of the validity of a noncompete entered by Oklahoma residents in connection with the sale of a business, to (1) affirm the trial court’s holdings that the noncompete was valid under Texas law and breached by the sellers, injunctive relief was warranted, and a company owned by the sellers tortiously interfered with the noncompete, and (2) reverse and remand the case to the trial court for a determination of actual and punitive damages. See Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLC, 2018 OK 27, 461 P.3d 1016 (2018).
- Convinced the Texas Supreme Court to reinstate a summary judgment in favor of one of the nation’s largest midstream energy companies in a highly publicized case in which a small town and many of its residents sued the owners of several compression stations for nuisance and trespass. See Town of Dish v. Atmos Energy Corp., 519 S.W.3d 605, 606 (Tex. 2017).
- Obtained a summary judgment and the upheld it on appeal in a million-dollar lawsuit by a Fort Worth used-car dealership against a floor-plan financing company for alleged breaches of the parties’ floor-plan financing agreement, DTPA violations, fraud, and defamation. See KW Ministries, Inc. v. Auction Credit Enterprises, LLC, No. 05-14-01392-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 2930 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 21, 2016) (mem. op.).
- Defeated appeal from a summary judgment in favor of a major electric transmission and distribution company in a $25,000,000 negligence action arising out of a wildfire that destroyed a lake resort and many houses allegedly caused by an employee’s careless smoking. See Club Vista Dev. II, Inc. v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co., No. 05-12-01727-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9081 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 15, 2014, pet. denied) (mem. op.).
- Successfully defended a major electric transmission and distribution company in a personal-injury lawsuit seeking more than $90 million in damages for injuries sustained by two minor children who allegedly contacted a downed power line.
- Obtained a zero-liability judgment after a two-week bench trial in deceptive-advertising action brought by the FTC against three debt-settlement companies and their officers and directors in which the FTC sought more than $58 million dollars in damages, and then upheld the judgment on appeal. See FTC v. Financial Freedom Processing, Inc., et al., No. 3:10-CV-2446-N (N.D. T Mar. 12, 2012), aff’d, No. 12-10520, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16766 (5th Cir. Aug. 12, 2013).
- Obtained ruling clarifying the law on the proper calculation of administrative penalties under Section 15.023 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act. See PUC Docket No. 37634, Agreed Notice of Violation and Settlement Agreement Relating to Luminant Energy Company LLC’s Violation of PURA § 39.151(j) and PUC Subst. R. 25.503(f)(2), Relating to Failure to Adhere to ERCOT Protocol 6.10.5.4(1) Concerning Load Acting as Resource Service Requirements, Order on Certified Issue at 3 (Feb. 25, 2010).
- Successfully defended a major electric generating company in an administrative proceeding seeking the largest fine ($171 million) ever imposed by the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
- Obtained judgments clarifying Texas law on standing to sue accounting firms for negligent misrepresentation. See Compass Bank v. King, Griffin & Adamson, P.C., No. 3:01-CIV-2028-N, 2003 WL 22077721 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 5, 2003), aff’d, 388 F.3d 504 (5th 2004); Abrams Ctr. Nat’l Bank v. Farmer Fuqua & Huff, P.C., 225 S.W.3d 171 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, no pet.).
- Successfully tried and handled many complex commercial disputes for a variety of corporate clients, including obtaining a favorable jury verdict against Enron after a six-week jury trial.
- Successfully handled an ERISA class action for major electric utility.
- Successfully handled a derivate litigation for major electric utility
- Published opinions in appeals and mandamus proceedings: Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. v. Chaparral Energy, LLC, No. 16-0301, 546 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. 2018); Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLC, 2018 OK 27, 461 P.3d 1016 (2018); Town of Dish v. Atmos Energy Corp., 519 S.W.3d 605, 606 (Tex. 2017); In re Oncor Elec. Delivery Co., LLC, No. 05-23-00298-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 2154, 2023 WL 2726739 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 31, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).Lahijani v. Merit Energy Co., No. 14-20-00393-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6045, 2022 WL 345894 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 18, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re Wildcat Midstream Holdings, LLC, No. 13-17-0552-CV (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Nov. 15, 2017, orig. proceeding); KW Ministries, Inc. v. Auction Credit Enterprises, LLC, No. 05-14-01392-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 2930 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 21, 2016) (mem. op.); Club Vista Dev. II, Inc. v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co., No. 05-12-01727-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9081 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 15, 2014, pet. denied) (mem. op.); CQ Inc. v. TXU Mining Co., 565 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2009); Metromedia Energy, Inc. v. Enserch Energy Servs., Inc., 409 F.3d 574 (3d Cir. 2005); Friberg v. Kan. City So. Ry., 267 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2001); Abrams Ctr. Nat’l Bank v. Farmer Fuqua & Huff, P.C., 225 S.W.3d 171 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, no pet.); Larue v. Genescreen, Inc., 957 S.W.2d 958 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1997, pet. denied).